There was astonishment in the academic world today as the
FIFA University of Competitive Knowledge confirmed that the current
Vice-Chancellor Blatter would continue in his post indefinitely despite recent
scandals involving the instant dismissal of their leading academic striker
together with his entire family, and the closure of the university’s
world-leading tactical research institute. Blatter’s demise had been hotly
predicted by the press, although it appears they underestimated the extent of
his establishment connections. Blatter is a man with friends in high places
each of whom has a lot to lose in the event of his demise. These include the
spiritual leader of footballer-academics worldwide, the Archbishop of
Registered Soccer Experts - who sponsor the University; the Chief Regulator of Appropriate
Penalties, the chief legislator of the University; The Baron of
International Training, Competition and Health who glad-hands politicians; the
Special Lieutenant Of Breadmaking, who is responsible for University catering, together
with members of the university’s Central Office for Watchfulness And
Responsibility in Direction and Strategy.
The leading Russian football academic who was the victim of
Blatter’s ire, Damienko Markeyovitch was also head of the University player’s
association. Blatter accused him of contacting the FBI leading to the arrest of a
number of Blatter’s close associates and extensive and rather unflattering
press coverage which drew attention, amongst other things, to Blatter’s rather
lascivious lifestyle, including his well-known support for suspender belts (see http://news.sky.com/story/858044/how-blatter-climbed-to-the-peak-of-football).
University sources report that the mood in FIFA University
of Competitive Knowledge as “desperate”. “The reign of terror continues,” said
one academic. Meanwhile, further news has broken concerning the University’s
sponsorship of its football team by a scientific company, “Fibalot”,
established by the University to develop what is described as new “Ball
Technology”. Fibalot describe their recent innovations involving composite
materials in ball technology as a ‘revolution in energy harvesting’. They are
attempting to market a special alloy coating for footballs comprising Lead and
Plutonium. Footballs coated in the Fibalot material act, according to Fibalot,
as “energy transducers”, converting player kinetic energy into an atomic chain
reaction. This, Fibalot argue, has the win-win advantages of solving the
world’s energy crisis, and shortening football games to the benefit of teams
using the Fibalot coating. However, the recent FBI investigation has questioned
Fibalot’s figures: it appears that demand for the Fibalot coating is not as
great as they claim (although the Islamic State Football Association has
declared some interest), and that company receipts are close to zero (that is, the
negative side of “close”).
Blatter has declared his delight in being confirmed in his
position indefinitely by the Central Office for Watchfulness And Responsibility
in Direction and Strategy, saying that he would continue with his current
strategic projects. These include tripling the size of the FIFA University of
Competitive Knowledge campus funded by money taken out as loans by students,
increasing the centralised power structures of the university led by the
Central University Nastiness Team (and providing them with cut-price mortgages),
increasing recruitment to the Committee for Regularised and Orthodox Notions of
Institutional Excellence and Success (which has seen a movement of staff from
Blatter’s previous institution), extension of the current policy of Staff
Happiness Inversion Therapy (which has shown remarkable results in keeping
wages down and teaching hours high), and creating a special “STEL centre”
(Science, Technology, Engineering and Lust) which will further Blatter’s passionate
desire to develop high-tech solutions for helping ugly old men attract women. Furthermore,
borrowing the Catholic Church’s philosophy of “catch ‘em young”, Blatter is
also about to open a school, the “Children’s Organisation for the Creation of
Knowledge on University Premises”, with the intention of pre-loading future
sources of finance (children) for his schemes.
Meanwhile, the FBI, the Press, and the rest of the academic
community watch in astonishment at his apparent indestructibility. “How can
this man possibly survive?” they ask themselves. And other University
Vice-Chancellors quietly think, “and how can I emulate him?”
No comments:
Post a Comment